<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Economics 101</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://gatewaynode.com/taxonomy/term/66"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gatewaynode.com/taxonomy/term/66/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://gatewaynode.com/taxonomy/term/66/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-05-20T20:33:09-07:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>The Service Economy Myth </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://gatewaynode.com/node/46" />
    <id>http://gatewaynode.com/node/46</id>
    <published>2008-07-18T06:33:10-07:00</published>
    <updated>2008-07-18T06:33:10-07:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>justjohn</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Economics 101" />
    <category term="Market Pressure" />
    <category term="Politics" />
    <category term="Propaganda" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><img hspace="8" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://gatewaynode.com/sites/default/files/images/Chrisdesign_birthday_cake_redux.png" alt="This picture of a cake is a LIE" /> 	 	 	</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Ever wonder why the dollar is in a steady decline?  Ever wonder why so many foreign corporations and companies own so much American property?</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; It's really quite simply because we have ceased to be a producing nation.  Not that we are not very productive, very busy, very hard working.  It's just that we no longer produce very much physical material for all of our hard labors. This is not to say that our exhaustive intellectual property or managerial and IT service isn't worth anything, it has value, in it's own way.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; But here is the problem: all this intellectual property, managerial whatnot and IT services, you can't eat them, you can't wear them, they will not quench your thirst, they will not power your machines.  They are luxuries.</p>
<p>Can you build a country's economy solely on luxuries?</p>
<p>Yeah, I didn't think so either.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><img hspace="8" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://gatewaynode.com/sites/default/files/images/Chrisdesign_birthday_cake_redux.png" alt="This picture of a cake is a LIE" /> 	 	 	</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Ever wonder why the dollar is in a steady decline?  Ever wonder why so many foreign corporations and companies own so much American property?</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; It's really quite simply because we have ceased to be a producing nation.  Not that we are not very productive, very busy, very hard working.  It's just that we no longer produce very much physical material for all of our hard labors. This is not to say that our exhaustive intellectual property or managerial and IT service isn't worth anything, it has value, in it's own way.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; But here is the problem: all this intellectual property, managerial whatnot and IT services, you can't eat them, you can't wear them, they will not quench your thirst, they will not power your machines.  They are luxuries.</p>
<p>Can you build a country's economy solely on luxuries?</p>
<p>Yeah, I didn't think so either.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The service sector should be just that, a sector, it shouldn't even be a majority sector if we want a strong and fruitful economy.  If we want an economy that concentrates wealth into our country and it's citizens, it has to produce real main stream products, not luxuries.  As we saw in the 70's and 80's the manufacturing sector of our economy could not compete very well against foreign manufacturers.  This is the normal give and take in the system, but in the US there is a problem with the corporation system and the government.  Nothing serious was done to keep the manufacturing sector afloat.  We did not raise tremendous tariffs on imported manufactured goods and direct that money into manufacturing R&amp;D.  Nope, we just started importing more manufactured goods, first from Japan and then China as they became more industrialized.  And of course how did we paid for all these imported goods?  <img hspace="6" align="left" vspace="6" src="http://gatewaynode.com/sites/default/files/images/dollar-stream.png" alt="A persepctive shot of line up 20 dollar bills fading into the distance" />Well let's just say it wasn't a fair trade, we definitely did not exchange our manufactured goods for theirs.  We paid for it with the accumulated wealth of a nation that was once the undisputed industrial world leader.  We paid for it in dollars, which now that it's not based on any metal reserve system is more like stock in the American government than any sort of real currency.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; It's not that we couldn't make major changes to the corporate system that rewards the quick buck over the long term investment.  It's not that the government couldn't use tariff money to run large and risky research programs that would make our manufacturing sector competitive again.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; It was just easier to outsource our manufacturing economy.  Kind of like how it's easier to import oil than develop alternative fuel sources...</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; So all that news that we've been hearing over the years about how &ldquo;our economy is becoming a sort of service economy&rdquo; has been a lie, what they we're really saying is &ldquo;our economy is failing, so we're going to tell you it's becoming something better so you don't panic!&rdquo;</p>
<p>But,</p>
<p>in truth,</p>
<p>without an economy based in manufacturing,</p>
<p>or an economy based in exportable energy commodities,</p>
<p>or an economy based on any sort of basic human need instead of luxuries,</p>
<p>our economy is a lie.</p>
<p>Just like the cake...</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The net result of misplaced blame</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://gatewaynode.com/node/27" />
    <id>http://gatewaynode.com/node/27</id>
    <published>2008-05-20T20:04:07-07:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-20T20:33:09-07:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>justjohn</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Economics 101" />
    <category term="Peak Oil" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><img hspace="8" align="left" alt="The earth being locked up in a cage so we won&#039;t hurt anbody..." src="http://gatewaynode.com/sites/default/files/images/the_whole_world_is_going_crazy_CC_by_AZrainman.jpg" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Popular culture appears to be slowly jumping <a href="http://www.wired.com/">on the green bandwagon</a>, even as the necessity of personal sacrifice becomes unavoidably apparent.  And I find myself in constant position of explaining the deeper implications to simple things.  Such as,  Just the other day I was talking with my youngest brother, who is seventeen years my junior.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The topic was biodiesel, and he was quick to explain to me that I shouldn't be considering biodiesel because using it is causing starvation in other countries.  But, it's not really US citizens using biodiesel that is causing food shortages in particular.  It's market pressure from many different angles that is making food increasingly expensive that is causing food shortages in other countries.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Buying a gallon of gasoline for $4.00 is doing just as much as buying a gallon of biodiesel made from corn in pushing up the cost of food in Egypt(<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/04/AR2008040403937_pf.html">for example</a>).  A willingness, or the force of social addiction, to pay such high prices for portable energy, has a ripple effect on the very foundations of the food market.  Four dollar a gallon gas means the petroleum used for fertilizers that are the true power behind modern agriculture gets more expensive, so farmers have to raise the prices to cover their overhead.  And what is worse is that there is a market ripple delay...</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><img hspace="8" align="left" alt="The earth being locked up in a cage so we won&#039;t hurt anbody..." src="http://gatewaynode.com/sites/default/files/images/the_whole_world_is_going_crazy_CC_by_AZrainman.jpg" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Popular culture appears to be slowly jumping <a href="http://www.wired.com/">on the green bandwagon</a>, even as the necessity of personal sacrifice becomes unavoidably apparent.  And I find myself in constant position of explaining the deeper implications to simple things.  Such as,  Just the other day I was talking with my youngest brother, who is seventeen years my junior.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The topic was biodiesel, and he was quick to explain to me that I shouldn't be considering biodiesel because using it is causing starvation in other countries.  But, it's not really US citizens using biodiesel that is causing food shortages in particular.  It's market pressure from many different angles that is making food increasingly expensive that is causing food shortages in other countries.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Buying a gallon of gasoline for $4.00 is doing just as much as buying a gallon of biodiesel made from corn in pushing up the cost of food in Egypt(<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/04/AR2008040403937_pf.html">for example</a>).  A willingness, or the force of social addiction, to pay such high prices for portable energy, has a ripple effect on the very foundations of the food market.  Four dollar a gallon gas means the petroleum used for fertilizers that are the true power behind modern agriculture gets more expensive, so farmers have to raise the prices to cover their overhead.  And what is worse is that there is a market ripple delay...</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; For the price of food this year is based mainly on the cost of petroleum based fertilizers last year, and however much the cost of fertilizer was speculated to rise this year.  And by all accounts, most markets <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_21/b4085023648823.htm?chan=magazine+channel_top+stories">did not correctly predict the rapid rise in the price of petroleum</a> this year.  So the while the grain prices this year are high, they may not be high enough to compensate the farmers for higher fertilizer prices for next years crop.  So unless the current spike in prices rapidly reverses itself, many farmers across the globe will have to raise their prices even higher next year to cover the additional cost.  That's not even counting further speculation of even higher prices, based on the failures to predict this years petroleum prices.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; So just about anything you're willing to pay more for that depends on oil will further push the market into an exaggerated climb that will starve the poor of the world who can no longer afford the petroleum based staple food crops.  Biodiesel does not deserve anymore attention for this problem than bottled water, gasoline, sneakers, SUV's, anything plastic or any other thing that depends on gasoline for it's production (which is just about everything in the United States and much of the world).</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; These are the first market fluctuations of &ldquo;peak oil&rdquo;, it can and most likely will get worse.  Don't shift the blame to possible solutions, accept that our societies addiction to petroleum is the problem.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
